Posts Tagged ‘ light ’

Wall Street Journal Kindle Digital

Search For Wall Street Journal Kindle Digital at Amazon

Wall Street Journal Kindle Digital

Wall Street Journal Kindle Digital Photo

Wall Street Journal Kindle Digital

Wall Street Journal Kindle Digital Photo

Wall Street Journal Kindle Digital

Wall Street Journal Kindle Digital Pic

Wall Street Journal Kindle Digital

Wall Street Journal Kindle Digital Pic

Wall Street Journal Kindle Digital

Wall Street Journal Kindle Digital Pic

Wall Street Journal Kindle Digital

Wall Street Journal Kindle Digital Picture

Wall Street Journal Kindle Digital

Wall Street Journal Kindle Digital Image

Wall Street Journal Kindle Digital

Wall Street Journal Kindle Digital Picture

Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs), “semiconductors that emit light when zapped with [positive polarity] electricity,”[1] are on the verge of taking over the mercantile and buyer spheres of the lighting industry. With dandier efficiency, longer utile lives, and their “clean” nature, LEDs are the future of light, pushing traditionalisti incandescent and fluorescent bulbs toward extinction. Only the higher production costs for LEDs has extended the existence of conventional bulbs.

History

When observing the history of established bulbs, the higher costs affiliated with fabricating LEDs is not an insurmountable hurdle to overcome. The incandescent bulb lingered for when it comes to 70 years before supplanting “candles, oil lanterns, and gas lamps” as the main source of lighting.[2] When the introductory crude incandescent bulb was developed in 1809 by Humphrey Davy, an English chemist, using two charcoal strips to construct light, it remained impractical. Later when the basi true incandescent bulb was formulated by Warren De la Rue in 1820, utilizing a platinum filament to manufacture light, it was too highpriced for mercantile use. Only when Thomas Edison produced an incandescent bulb utilizing a carbonized filament within a vacuum in 1879, did the incandescent bulb become practical and lowpriced for buyer use.

Although considered comparatively novel, the conception for LEDs primary arose in 1907 when Henry Joseph Round employed a piece of Silicone Carbide (SiC) to emit a dim, yellow light. This was followed by experiments conducted by Bernhard Gudden and Robert Wichard Pohl in Germany for the duration of the late 1920s, in which they employed “phosphor materials made from Zinc Sulphide (ZnS) [treated] with Copper (Cu)” to fabricate dim light.[3] However, for the duration of this time, a major obstacle existed, in that some of these early LEDs could not function expeditiously at room temperature. Instead, they necessitated to be submerged in liquid nitrogen (N) for optimal performance.

This led to British and American experiments in the 1950s that applied Gallium Arsenide (GaAs) as a alternate for Zinc Sulphide (ZnS) and the creation of an LED that invented invisible, infrared light at room temperature. These LEDs without delay found use in photoelectric, sensing applications. The initial “visible spectrum” LED, developing “red” light was devised in 1962 by Nick Holonyak, Jr. (b. 1928) of the General Electric Company who used Gallium Arsenide Phosphide (GaAsP) in place of Gallium Arsenide (GaAs). Once in existence, they were quickly adopted for use as indicator lights.

Before long these red LEDs were developing more glorious light and even orange-colored electroluminescence when Gallium Phosphide (GaP) substrates were used. By the mid 1970s, Gallium Phoshide (GaP) itself along with dual Gallium Phosphide (GaP) substrates were being used to fabricate red, green, and yellow light. This ushered in the trend “towards [LED use in] more practical applications” such as calculators, digital watches and test equipment, since these expanded colors addressed the fact that “the humane eye is most responsive to yellow-green light.”[4]

However, rapid growth in the LED industry did not begin until the 1980s when Gallium Aluminium Arsenides (GaAIAs) were developed, providing “superbright” LEDs (10x more brilliant than LEDs in use at the time) – “first in red, then yellow and… green,” which also required less voltage providing energy savings. [5] This led to the conception of the basi LED flashlight, in 1984.

Then in parallel with emergent laser diode technology, which focalized on maximizing light output, the firstborn “ultrabright” LEDs were devised in the early 1990s through the use of Indium Gallium Aluminium Phosphide (InGaAIP) led in part by Toshiba’s creation of an LED that “reflected 90% or more of the generated light…” In addition, for the duration of this same period, it was came across that dissimilar colors, including “white” (although a “true” white light was only not long ago formulated through the use of an organic LED (OLED) by Cambridge Display Technology, in the U.K.) could be developed through “adjustments in the size of the energy band gap” when Indium Gallium Aluminium Phosphide (InGaAIP) was used, much in share because of the work of Shuji Nakamura of Nichia Corporation, who devised the world’s initial blue LED in 1993.[6] Today, this engineering science is applied to formulate LEDs that even emit “exotic colors” such as pink, purple and aqua as well as “genuine ultra-violet ‘black’ light.[7]

A critical milestone was reached in 1997 when it became cost effective to manufacture “high brightness” LEDs in which the intensity (benefits) exceeded the related costs to fabricate it.

In conjunction with this milestone, newer engineering is emergent that will likely reduce costs even further (and improve lighting) – the introduction of quantum dots or microscopic crystals ([8]

Advantages

The vantages of adopting LEDs to provide sole source lighting for each application are significant. LEDs emit almost no heat (wasted energy) and are “in fact… cool to the touch” different from incandescent light bulbs. They are likewise more lasting (encased in a hardened shell and immune to vibration and shocks) than and last up to 50 times longer than traditionalisti incandescent and fluorescent bulbs ( a heap of may be employed for up to 10 years), and they “use a dandier proportionality of the electricity flowing through them” translating into “savings for consumers.” [9] According to the U.S. Department of Energy, “widespread adoption of LEDs could cut U.S. consumption of electricity for lighting by 29%”[10] since they require less energy to function and by their nature, reduce the amount of air conditioning necessitated to keep areas cool and comfortable.

The shape of LEDs likewise provides lighting gains when equated to that of conventional bulbs. Unlike incandescent and fluorescent bulbs, LEDs do not require the use of an external reflector to gather and direct their light. In addition, “LEDs light up very quickly… achiev[ing] full luminance in approximately 0.01 seconds – 10 times more immediate than” conventional bulbs.[11]

LEDs likewise manufacture no ultra-violet output, which may harm fabrics, different from conventional bulbs; they are light-weight, ecologically friendly, and may invent dissimilar colors (without the use of color filters) based on the amount of power provided to each essential color ensuring that electricity is not wasted. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Nano Structures Lab) is presently conducting exploration that could lead to the creation of an LED “where both color and intensity (brightness) may be set electronically.”[12]

Uses and the Future

As LEDs gain a more outstanding portion of the lighting market, they are presently employed in a potpourri of gimmicks and apps ranging from traffic control gadgets (e.g. traffic lights, which include the single signal device that changes colors from green to yellow to red), barricade lights, hazard signs, message displays (e.g. Times Square, New York, commodities and news message boards, scoreboards), cellphones, televisions, big video screens employed at sporting and other outdoor events (e.g. Miami Dolphins end-zone screen), calculators, digital clocks and watches, flashlights (including models for which 60 seconds of manual winding provides one-hour of light, eliminating the need to stockpile fresh batteries for emergencies), Christmas lights, airport runway lights, buoy lights, and automotive apps (e.g. indicator lights as well as head lights and signal lights in numerous vehicles; driver’s of the new 2006 Ford Mustang may even alter the color (125 dissimilar varieties) of their “LED-laden dashboard by using the ‘MyColor’ feature”[13]).

In fact the automotive industry plans to replace all bulbs with LEDs by 2010, while attempts are presently underway to replace all traffic signals with LED devices. At the same time, plans are in place to ultimately use LEDs to light streets as well as much of the Third World and other areas “with no means of electricity” since “solar charged batteries” may power LEDs for the duration of each night. [14]

In addition, “Phillips Electronics is developing remote-controlled LED room lighting [while] Boeing Corp. plans to use LED’s all around the interior of it is new 787 Dreamliner mercantile jet.”[15]

With the promise that LEDs hold, it is likely that someday they will provide illumination for houses and offices, X-Ray capablenesses for the medical field, power computer monitors, as well as an potpourri of other appliances and applications. The future prospects or potentials are endless. However, before LEDs may supplant the established bulb, “designers and advocates of the technology must overcome… the frequent obstacles to mainstream market adoption: Industry-accepted standards will have to be devised and costs ought to be reduced.”[16] Currently costs are coming down and a good deal of companies are moving towards these industry standards (e.g. Phillips Electronics is working on LED bulbs that may screw into existent light sockets, while besthomeledlighting.com already offers LED screwable bulbs — one consisting of 70 LEDS that emits a “warm white color similar to the light from an incandescent bulb”[17] using only 3 Watts of energy and another LED bulb that in truth changes colors when lit). With these attempts along with the adoption, exploitation, and production of LED engineering science by growing numbers of companies, it is inevitable that LEDs will become the sole source of lighting rendering conventional incandescent and fluorescent bulbs extinct. In short, LEDs are the light of the future, a light that will gain not only buyers but likewise industry and the Earth in general.

__________________________________________________________________________

[1]Evan Ramstad and Kathryn Kranshold. Changing the Light Bulb. The Wall Street Journal. June 8, 2006. B1.

[2]The History of the Light Bulb. 9 June 2006. http://invsee.asu.edu/Modules/lightbulb/meathist.htm

[3]A brief history of the Light Emitting Diode (LED). Wavicle Ltd. 2002-2006. 9 June 2006. http://www.wavicle.biz/led_history.html

[4]The History of LED Technology. Marktech Optoelectronics. 2006. 8 June 2006. [http://www.marktechopto.com/Engineering%20Services/leds-drivers-displays-driver-technical-]
articles-detailed/leds-drivers-displays-driver-technical-articles-history.cfm

[5]A brief history of the Light Emitting Diode (LED). Wavicle Ltd. 2002-2006. 9 June 2006. http://www.wavicle.biz/led_history.html

[6]The History of LED Technology. Marktech Optoelectronics. 2006. 8 June 2006. [http://www.marktechopto.com/Engineering%20Services/leds-drivers-displays-driver-technical-]
articles-detailed/leds-drivers-displays-driver-technical-articles-history.cfm

[7]A brief history of the Light Emitting Diode (LED). Wavicle Ltd. 2002-2006. 9 June 2006. http://www.wavicle.biz/led_history.html

[8] Joab Jackson. Accidental Find to Signal “Lights Out” for Incandescent Bulbs? National Geographic.com. 1 November 2005. 9 June 2006. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/11/1101_051101_quantum_lightbulb.html

[9]Joab Jackson. Accidental Find to Signal “Lights Out” for Incandescent Bulbs? National Geographic.com. 1 November 2005. 9 June 2006. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/11/1101_051101_quantum_lightbulb_2.html

[10]Joab Jackson. Accidental Find to Signal “Lights Out” for Incandescent Bulbs? National Geographic.com. 1 November 2005. 9 June 2006. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/11/1101_051101_quantum_lightbulb_2.html

[11]Light-emitting diode. Wikipedia.com. 2006. 9 June 2006. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LEDs

[12]A brief history of LED lighting. 9 June 2006. [http://216.239.51.104/search?q=cache:ach2mPa9iP0J:www.artisticlicence.com/]
app%2520notes/appnote022.pdf+A+Brief+History+of+LED+Lighting&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=3

[13]Evan Ramstad and Kathryn Kranshold. Changing the Light Bulb. The Wall Street Journal. June 8, 2006. B6.

[14]A brief history of the Light Emitting Diode (LED). Wavicle Ltd. 2002-2006. 9 June 2006. http://www.wavicle.biz/led_history.html

[15]Evan Ramstad and Kathryn Kranshold. Changing the Light Bulb. The Wall Street Journal. June 8, 2006. B6.

[16]Joe Knisley. Understanding LED Technology. EC&M. 1 April 2002. 8 June 2006. http://www.ecmweb.com/mag/electric_understanding_led_technology/

[17]70-LED Light Bulb, White Large Globe. 10 June 2006. [http://www.besthomeledlighting.com/product/G32-120-E27-70-W]

_______________________________________________________________________

Sources:

A brief history of LED lighting. 9 June 2006. [http://216.239.51.104/search?q=cache:ach2mPa9iP0J:www.artisticlicence.com/app%2520notes/appnote022.pdf]
+A+Brief+History+of+LED+Lighting&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=3

A brief history of the Light Emitting Diode (LED). Wavicle Ltd. 2002-2006. 9 June 2006. http://www.wavicle.biz/led_history.html

Cameron Walker. Green Christmas: Tips for an Eco-Friendly Holiday.Changing the Light Bulb. The Wall Street Journal. June 8, 2006.

Joab Jackson. Accidental Find to Signal “Lights Out” for Incandescent Bulbs? National Geographic.com. 1 November 2005. 9 June 2006. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/11/1101_051101_quantum_lightbulb.html

Joe Knisley. Understanding LED Technology. EC&M. 1 April 2002. 8 June 2006. http://www.ecmweb.com/mag/electric_understanding_led_technology/

LED Light Bulbs. 10 June 2006. http://www.besthomeledlighting.com/all_led_bulbs?gclid=CNmA2KKDvYUCFT1qGgodRQN7qA

Light-emitting diode. Wikipedia.com. 2006. 9 June 2006. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LEDs

Mary Bellis. The Inventions of Thomas Edison. About, Inc. A Part of The New York Times Company. 2006. 9 June 2006. http://inventors.about.com/library/inventors/bledison.htm

The History of LED Technology. Marktech Optoelectronics. 2006. 8 June 2006. [http://www.marktechopto.com/Engineering%20Services/leds-drivers-displays-driver-]
technical-articles-detailed/leds-drivers-displays-driver-technical-articles-history.cfm

The History of the Light Bulb. 9 June 2006. http://invsee.asu.edu/Modules/lightbulb/meathist.htm


Wall Street Journal Kindle Digital

Subscribe to The Wall Street Journal Kindle and Digital Plus and get access to WSJ on all Kindle e-Ink devices, the WSJ Kindle Fire App, Kindle for iPad, Kindle for Android, WSJ.com, the WSJ iPad app, and all WSJ smartphone apps. Experience everything you love with regards to The Journal including, What’s News, Opinion, Marketplace, Money & Investing, Greater New York, Personal Journal, WSJ Weekend and more – anytime, anyplace from any device.

The Wall Street Journal is the world’s leading business and financial news publication, delivering the most necessary news of the day, perceptive opinion and fair-minded analysis. The Journal delivers expert clear or deep perception on the market and economy and how both may affect every day finances and personal investment. Over 2,000 journalists from throughout the globe provide on-the-ground coverage of world news, political events, and emergent technologies, supplying reliable, exact reporting you may trust. In addition to global and national news, The Journal provides consecrated coverage of the Greater New York area, with local news and features each day. WSJ Weekend, is delivered each Saturday. This not so long ago redesigned edition not only offers business and economic news, but likewise includes our thought-provoking Review section, and Off Duty, featuring interests that readers are most ardent about, including: Cooking & Eating, Style & Fashion, Adventure & Travel and Design & Decorating.

The Kindle Edition of The Wall Street Journal holds articles found in the print and online editions, but does not include tables and stock quotes. For your convenience, issues are mechanically delivered wirelessly to your Kindle starting at 5:00 AM New York City local time. Please note that The Wall Street Journal publishes only Monday through Saturday.

  • Amazon Sales Rank: #70 in Digital Text Feeds
  • Format: Newspaper Subscription

914 of 933 people found the following review helpful.
4Yep – Good but not Great
By M. Yergin
I’ve been giving the kindle version of the WSJ a try for the last week. I’m also currently a print version subscriber, but not an WSJ Online subscriber. I agree with a previous reviewer that this is a good but not great product. Here’s what’s good:

- Ready for me to read every morning, and I don’t have to go outside to get it.
- Includes articles from the Online version at the end. I’ve not seen anyone comment on this. This is nice, and allows news that breaks after the paper goes to press to be added to the download.
- Easier to read (no fighting with the paper itself)
- Hands stay clean
- Searchable
- At $120 per year, this is a good value vs. the print version at $250 per year. And I don’t think comparisons to the cost of WSJ online are valid. The kindle version can go with you and be read anywhere, just like the paper version. The online version cannot.
- No ads

Here’s what I need to see to call it great (are you reading this WSJ?):

- The What’s News section. NO IDEA why this is not included now. Makes no sense. No pictures – that I understand. But why the What’s News section is not included is beyond me.
- I want every article to have a small lead-in after the headline like what is included with the articles found on page one of every section. This gives me some idea of what the article is about because the article headline is not always descriptive enough. Even if you just give me the first sentence… With the paper version you can quickly scan the the first few sentences to see if this is an article of interest. Can’t do this with the way the current kindle version of the paper is produced.
- I do miss the the pictures, althought the famous WSJ line drawing head shots are included. Would like to see some pictures eventually.

Ultimately, I think I will convert to the kindle edition. If some of my wish list items above are added, it will be a no-brainer.

1357 of 1394 people found the following review helpful.
3Price doesn’t make sense
By Stephen
First of all, having the WSJ delivered when I am at home or on the road is a great feature. I like the Kindle Edition enough to want to keep it.

However, I have to agree with others here that say the pricing makes absolutely no sense:

$99/year for the WSJ print edition with the Online Web edition included.

$119.88/year ($9.99/month) for the Kindle edition just doesn’t make sense. Especially since the Kindle edition has fewer features, and almost none of the Pictures.

So apparently the extra $20/year is for Whispernet delivery. That makes no sense because I could buy the Web edition and read it through the Kindle Browser for no additional charge.

Amazon, the pricing on this makes no sense. Either get the WSJ people to include the Web edition in the price tag, or lower the price $30 or so per year. Less content for a greater price is simply not a good deal.

582 of 595 people found the following review helpful.
1Price increase kills it!
By R. Musumeci
It was really nice to have the WSJ delivered electronically to my Kindle, but the recent price increase to $14.99 a month really kills the concept.
The original price was $9.99 per month, or $120 per year…a slight premium to the $103 you would pay for the online version. It was worth it at that price for the convenience of having it on the Kindle. With the recent price increase of 50% to $14.99 per month, or $180 per year, it really is not worth it. I also can’t imagine what their justification is for charging a 75% premium for the Kindle version. Finally, it seems rather predatory of them to initially price it at $9.99 and then increase it to $14.99 after getting a bunch of people to spend the money for the device…we are now a captive audience and it seems they are going to extract whatever they can from us. Don’t buy it.

See all 383 customer reviews…

AmazonKindleStoreAndReviews.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to (amazonkindlestoreandreviews.com (amazon.com, or endless.com, MYHABIT.com, SmallParts.com, or AmazonWireless.com).